For resources, videos and tutorials on the whole systematic searching process, broken down into bite size pieces, including PRISMA diagrams, please see the MyUni Library Essentials module on Systematic searching.
Start considering your key search terms by identifying the key concepts in your research questions and then consider synonyms, related terms, different spellings, abbreviations, more specific and general terms that an author or authors may have used to discuss the topic.
Research question frameworks can help you to frame your research question and identify concepts for your structured literature review or empirical research.
We've listed a few research question frameworks here but there are many more. If your topic does not fit a framework you can also just separate your topic into different search concepts.
The PICO framework can help you to frame your research question and identify concepts for a medical/clinical search. It is widely used in systematic reviews and evidence-based practice.
Example question: Does the use of Handwashing reduce the risk of hospital acquired infections.
Problem/Patient/Population | Who or what is the focus of your research | Hospital acquired infection |
Intervention | What intervention or treatment are you investigating | Handwashing |
Comparison | Are you comparing this intervention (not always necessary) | Hand gels or sanitizers |
Outcome | What effect does this intervention have | Reduce infections |
The PEO framework can help you to frame a qualitative research question.
Example question: How does Alzheimer's affect the caregiver's quality of life.
Population | Who is the focus of your research | Caregivers |
Exposure | What is the issue you are interested in | Alzheimer's |
Outcome | Outcomes you want to examine | Quality of life |
The SPICE framework can help you to frame your research question and identify concepts for a Social Sciences or healthcare search.
Example question: In low-income communities in the UK, how does access to green spaces affect mental well-being
Setting | Location of the study | UK |
Perspective/Population | The group you are studying | Low income communities |
Intervention/Interest, of Phenomenon | What intervention or treatment are you researching | Access to green spaces |
Comparison | Are you comparing this intervention (not always necessary) | No access to green spaces |
Evaluation | What are the outcomes | Does it affect Mental Health |
Booth, A. (2004). Formulating answerable questions. In A. Booth & A. Brice (Eds.), Evidence based practice for information professionals: A handbook (pp. 61-70). Facet Publishing.
The SPIDER framework can help you to frame your research question and identify concepts for a Social Sciences or healthcare search, and is particularly useful for qualitative or mixed method research questions.
Example question: What are young parents’ experiences of attending antenatal education? (Cooke et al., 2012)
Sample | Group of people you are researching | Young Parents |
Phenomenon of Interest | What is being investigated | Experience of Antenatal education |
Design | Research methods used | Questionnaires or Interviews |
Evaluation | What outcomes are being measured | Views or Experiences |
Research type | What is the research type | Qualitative |
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435-1443.
Embase is a biomedical and pharmacological database with access to more than 37 million records including articles from more than 8,100 journals published world-wide.
Medline provides authoritative medical information on medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, pre-clinical sciences, and much more. Medline uses MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) indexing with tree hierarchy, subheadings and explosion capabilities to search citations from over 5,400 current biomedical journals.
Scopus is an abstract and citation database of research literature and quality web sources in the fields of Medicine, Social Sciences, Physical Sciences and Life Sciences. The database also provides information on citation analysis for specific articles, authors, and journal metrics.
Click on the button below to see a list of all our databases. Refine your search further by choosing a Subject or Type from the drop-down list.
Grey literature refers to both published and unpublished research material that is not available commercially. A systematic review can be biased when it fails to report crucial information that may be hidden in some grey literature. A search of grey literature is one way to address potentially biased reporting of research results in published material.
Some examples of grey literature are:
Grey literature can be the best source of up-to-date research on some topics note however that grey literature is usually not subject to peer review and must be evaluated accordingly.
Step 1: Note the design(s) of the studies to be included in your review
Step 2: Identify the type(s) of quality assessment tool(s) to suit your review
Step 3: Source appropriate quality assessment tool(s)
Step 4: Carry out quality assessment using the appropriate tool(s)
Step 5: Tabulate and summarize the results of your quality assessment
Step 6: Think about how the quality assessment results might impact on the recommendations and conclusions of your systematic review
Your Librarians: Erika, Stephen, Izzy, Gillian, and Elen.
We are here to help you find information for your assignments and reference the information you use.